Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

COMPARE

Lithuanian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Potawatomi
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Lithuanians

Potawatomi

Excellent
Fair
8,827
SOCIAL INDEX
85.7/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
46th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
3,223
SOCIAL INDEX
29.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
227th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Potawatomi Integration in Lithuanian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,508,488 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.798. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.123% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 122.7 Potawatomi.
Lithuanian Integration in Potawatomi Communities

Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $84,613, a difference of 32.9%), median family income ($115,395 compared to $88,265, a difference of 30.7%), and per capita income ($49,448 compared to $38,046, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.7%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $46,462, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $54,212, a difference of 20.3%).
Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Income
Income MetricLithuanianPotawatomi
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,448
Tragic
$38,046
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,395
Tragic
$88,265
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$93,852
Tragic
$72,576
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$50,991
Tragic
$41,288
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$61,228
Tragic
$48,768
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$42,108
Tragic
$34,739
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$53,552
Tragic
$46,462
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$105,223
Tragic
$81,774
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,484
Tragic
$84,613
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,209
Tragic
$54,212
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
28.7%
Tragic
27.7%

Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 42.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 40.4%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 39.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.3% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 9.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.1% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 19.2%).
Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Poverty
Poverty MetricLithuanianPotawatomi
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
14.1%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.2%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
12.9%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
15.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.7%
Tragic
23.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.2%
Tragic
16.5%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
21.0%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
19.0%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.0%
Tragic
19.4%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.9%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Fair
13.0%
Tragic
15.8%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.2%
Tragic
25.4%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.3%
Tragic
18.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.4%
Tragic
34.1%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.0%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Good
10.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Average
12.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.7%
Poor
12.5%

Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 23.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLithuanianPotawatomi
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.8%
Good
5.2%
Males
Exceptional
5.0%
Fair
5.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Good
5.2%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Average
11.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Excellent
17.2%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Good
10.2%
Average
10.3%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Good
5.4%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Good
4.8%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Fair
5.4%
Average
5.4%
Seniors > 65
Average
5.1%
Good
5.1%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.9%
Exceptional
7.8%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.8%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.4%
Exceptional
8.5%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.7%

Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 0.98%), in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 0.99%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.0%).
Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLithuanianPotawatomi
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Tragic
62.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.2%
Tragic
77.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
40.4%
Exceptional
40.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.0%
Exceptional
76.2%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.8%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.6%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.6%
Tragic
80.0%

Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 22.6%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 21.5%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.6% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.1%), family households (64.0% compared to 63.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.16, a difference of 2.0%).
Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLithuanianPotawatomi
Family Households
Fair
64.0%
Tragic
63.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.6%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.9%
Poor
45.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.16
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.4%
Poor
6.6%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.0%
Average
46.5%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.5%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Tragic
36.2%

Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 15.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 8.7%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 0.44%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 0.47%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 4.8%).
Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLithuanianPotawatomi
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
8.4%
Exceptional
8.8%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
91.7%
Exceptional
91.3%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
58.2%
Exceptional
58.0%
3+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
20.1%
Exceptional
21.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
7.3%

Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 51.1%), master's degree (17.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 47.0%), and doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.30%).
Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Education Level
Education Level MetricLithuanianPotawatomi
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.4%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.6%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.2%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
97.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.6%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.5%
Exceptional
96.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.6%
Exceptional
95.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.8%
Exceptional
94.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Fair
91.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Average
89.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.9%
Tragic
84.7%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.8%
Tragic
61.8%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.9%
Tragic
54.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.6%
Tragic
40.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Tragic
31.9%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.7%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
3.6%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
1.6%

Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 14.8%, a difference of 36.6%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 29.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 8.8%), cognitive disability (16.3% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 12.2%).
Lithuanian vs Potawatomi Disability
Disability MetricLithuanianPotawatomi
Disability
Poor
11.9%
Tragic
14.2%
Males
Tragic
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Average
12.2%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.6%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.0%
Tragic
8.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Excellent
10.8%
Tragic
14.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
27.0%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
49.0%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.6%
Hearing
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
4.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
18.0%
Ambulatory
Excellent
6.0%
Tragic
7.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Tragic
2.6%