Chickasaw vs Potawatomi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,279,231 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Potawatomi within Chickasaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.156. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chickasaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.019% in Potawatomi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chickasaw corresponds to a decrease of 19.0 Potawatomi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($77,929 compared to $81,774, a difference of 4.9%), per capita income ($36,475 compared to $38,046, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($44,763 compared to $46,462, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,732 compared to $54,212, a difference of 0.89%), median female earnings ($34,414 compared to $34,739, a difference of 0.95%), and median earnings ($40,672 compared to $41,288, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (10.8% compared to 10.2%, a difference of 5.9%), receiving food stamps (13.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.0%), and married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (19.0% compared to 18.9%, a difference of 0.32%), single mother poverty (34.4% compared to 34.1%, a difference of 0.87%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.4% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 16.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.14%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.3% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 4.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 76.2%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (80.9% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (62.3% compared to 62.8%, a difference of 0.86%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (79.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.2%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and divorced or separated (14.2% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 36.2%, a difference of 0.14%), currently married (46.6% compared to 46.5%, a difference of 0.22%), and married-couple households (45.9% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 12.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.3%, a difference of 1.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.0% compared to 58.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 5.9%), master's degree (11.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 5.6%), and bachelor's degree (30.4% compared to 31.9%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.050%), and 7th grade (96.7% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chickasaw and Potawatomi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 27.4%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.6%, a difference of 20.0%), and disability age 65 to 74 (30.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.5% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.6%), disability age over 75 (51.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.8% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 4.6%).