Jordanian vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,390,180 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.206. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.047% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to an increase of 46.9 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($45,605 compared to $48,027, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $54,484, a difference of 5.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $103,486, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($91,794 compared to $91,605, a difference of 0.21%), median family income ($109,865 compared to $110,614, a difference of 0.68%), and median male earnings ($58,500 compared to $59,217, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.16%), single male poverty (12.3% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 12.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.44%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 2.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 2.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.95%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (28.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 9.0%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (48.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.81%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households (65.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 52.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 14.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.2%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and college, under 1 year (68.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.19%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.19%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 25.0%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 9.8%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (22.2% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 0.21%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.25%), and disability age over 75 (46.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.32%).