Scottish vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 399,968,571 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.525. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.121% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 120.5 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 10.2%), median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $42,275, a difference of 10.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $103,486, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,735 compared to $61,902, a difference of 0.27%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $107,775, a difference of 5.5%), and median family income ($104,288 compared to $110,614, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 21.0%), and receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 0.73%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 1.0%), and male poverty (10.4% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.2%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.1% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 13.2%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 15.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.53%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (12.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 9.2%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.5%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.5% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.39%), and births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 92.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 30.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 7.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 17.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 26.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 53.7%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and master's degree (15.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.81%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.82%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.0%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 19.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 17.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.0%), disability age over 75 (46.7% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.2%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.2%).