German Russian vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 86,497,046 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.377. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.038% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to a decrease of 37.9 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($85,220 compared to $103,486, a difference of 21.4%), median household income ($75,856 compared to $91,605, a difference of 20.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $107,775, a difference of 20.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $61,902, a difference of 11.8%), and median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $42,275, a difference of 13.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 38.6%), single female poverty (23.9% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 20.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 15.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 1.6%), receiving food stamps (11.8% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 16.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 10.5%), single mother households (6.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.48%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.18, a difference of 0.96%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 23.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.9%), master's degree (13.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 23.4%), and no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 16.1%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 15.9%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.3%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and female disability (12.6% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.4%).