Norwegian vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,994,168 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.397. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.003% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to a decrease of 2.8 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.6%), median female earnings ($38,802 compared to $42,275, a difference of 8.9%), and per capita income ($44,480 compared to $48,027, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $61,902, a difference of 1.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $54,484, a difference of 2.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $107,775, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (8.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 28.3%), and receiving food stamps (9.0% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (28.4% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 0.15%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.6% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and single male poverty (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.9%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.4% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 4.2%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 6.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 26.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (84.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.79%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.98%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 11.6%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 11.0%), and currently married (50.2% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 0.77%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.18, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 102.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 7.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 20.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 33.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.2%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and master's degree (14.0% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (47.6% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 0.43%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 21.4%), disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 19.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (12.3% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.75%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 1.5%).