Slovak vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 327,947,367 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Slovak communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.129. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Slovaks within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Slovaks corresponds to a decrease of 4.9 Immigrants from Southern Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($49,753 compared to $54,484, a difference of 9.5%), median household income ($83,798 compared to $91,605, a difference of 9.3%), and wage/income gap (28.9% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($59,039 compared to $61,902, a difference of 4.9%), median male earnings ($56,306 compared to $59,217, a difference of 5.2%), and median family income ($103,729 compared to $110,614, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 21.3%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.5% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 20.6%), and married-couple family poverty (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (15.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 1.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.5% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and female poverty (12.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 13.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.5% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.6% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.7% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 65.0%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 7.4%), single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.3% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and currently married (48.3% compared to 46.9%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.3% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 57.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 12.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.9% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 5.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 10.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 61.9%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.7%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (64.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.40%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and kindergarten (98.7% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Slovak and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 21.1%), hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 0.29%), disability age over 75 (45.8% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.5% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 1.8%).