Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Community Comparison

COMPARE

Pima
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ik
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMiddle AfricaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Pima

Immigrants from Southern Europe

Poor
Average
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
5,545
SOCIAL INDEX
53.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
174th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Southern Europe Integration in Pima Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,961,017 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.095. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.025% in Immigrants from Southern Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 25.3 Immigrants from Southern Europe.
Pima Integration in Immigrants from Southern Europe Communities

Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $48,027, a difference of 56.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $107,775, a difference of 46.9%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $91,605, a difference of 44.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $54,484, a difference of 5.8%), median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $42,275, a difference of 19.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $61,902, a difference of 22.5%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Income
Income MetricPimaImmigrants from Southern Europe
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$30,644
Exceptional
$48,027
Median Family Income
Tragic
$77,431
Exceptional
$110,614
Median Household Income
Tragic
$63,262
Exceptional
$91,605
Median Earnings
Tragic
$38,285
Exceptional
$50,280
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$42,357
Exceptional
$59,217
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,326
Exceptional
$42,275
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,503
Exceptional
$54,484
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,821
Exceptional
$103,486
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$73,365
Exceptional
$107,775
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$50,539
Good
$61,902
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
21.1%
Poor
26.4%

Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 136.8%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 116.8%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (25.3% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 98.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.9%), single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 28.4%, a difference of 35.7%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 19.9%, a difference of 52.7%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Poverty
Poverty MetricPimaImmigrants from Southern Europe
Poverty
Tragic
21.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Families
Tragic
18.4%
Excellent
8.5%
Males
Tragic
20.4%
Exceptional
10.5%
Females
Tragic
23.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
28.4%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
25.3%
Exceptional
12.8%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
16.1%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
29.0%
Excellent
15.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
29.7%
Excellent
15.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
28.2%
Exceptional
15.3%
Single Males
Tragic
20.2%
Exceptional
12.4%
Single Females
Tragic
30.3%
Exceptional
19.9%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.8%
Poor
16.7%
Single Mothers
Tragic
38.6%
Excellent
28.4%
Married Couples
Tragic
11.4%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
19.8%
Fair
11.1%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
23.9%
Poor
12.7%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
19.0%
Good
11.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 147.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 113.6%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 104.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 15.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Unemployment
Unemployment MetricPimaImmigrants from Southern Europe
Unemployment
Tragic
8.2%
Fair
5.3%
Males
Tragic
8.3%
Poor
5.4%
Females
Tragic
9.3%
Average
5.3%
Youth < 25
Tragic
16.2%
Poor
11.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
23.1%
Poor
17.9%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
14.2%
Tragic
10.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
6.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
9.6%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
11.8%
Fair
4.7%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
6.4%
Tragic
4.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Excellent
4.8%
Average
4.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
6.6%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
6.3%
Tragic
5.4%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.2%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
13.4%
Good
7.5%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
18.9%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
11.7%
Average
5.5%

Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 79.8%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 14.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.4%, a difference of 6.9%), in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 7.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 74.5%, a difference of 8.0%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricPimaImmigrants from Southern Europe
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Tragic
57.4%
Fair
65.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
69.0%
Good
79.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.1%
Average
36.4%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
69.0%
Poor
74.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
74.3%
Exceptional
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
79.0%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
74.8%
Exceptional
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
72.8%
Good
82.9%

Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 93.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 65.6%), and single mother households (8.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 36.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.60%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 11.4%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Family Structure
Family Structure MetricPimaImmigrants from Southern Europe
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Good
64.4%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.1%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
35.6%
Good
46.8%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.75
Tragic
3.18
Single Father Households
Tragic
4.2%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
8.3%
Excellent
6.1%
Currently Married
Tragic
35.9%
Good
46.9%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.9%
Exceptional
11.6%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
51.5%
Good
31.1%

Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 37.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 52.3%, a difference of 0.48%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.1%, a difference of 0.89%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 8.6%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricPimaImmigrants from Southern Europe
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
14.1%
Tragic
13.0%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.3%
Tragic
87.1%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.0%
Tragic
52.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.0%
Tragic
17.9%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.9%
Tragic
5.7%

Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.2% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 79.7%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 40.0%, a difference of 72.2%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 47.8%, a difference of 58.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.26%), nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.38%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.39%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Education Level
Education Level MetricPimaImmigrants from Southern Europe
No Schooling Completed
Average
2.1%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.7%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
97.1%
6th Grade
Excellent
97.2%
Tragic
96.7%
7th Grade
Good
96.1%
Tragic
95.7%
8th Grade
Fair
95.6%
Tragic
95.3%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.9%
Tragic
94.3%
10th Grade
Tragic
91.2%
Tragic
93.2%
11th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Poor
92.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
84.6%
Poor
90.8%
High School Diploma
Tragic
81.6%
Fair
88.7%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
76.4%
Fair
85.5%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
51.4%
Fair
64.9%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
45.6%
Average
59.5%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
30.2%
Excellent
47.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
23.2%
Exceptional
40.0%
Master's Degree
Tragic
9.2%
Exceptional
16.6%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.0%

Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Immigrants from Southern Europe communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 22.1%, a difference of 74.5%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 56.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (16.1% compared to 10.7%, a difference of 50.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 10.5%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 11.0%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 12.2%).
Pima vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Disability
Disability MetricPimaImmigrants from Southern Europe
Disability
Tragic
13.7%
Average
11.7%
Males
Tragic
12.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Tragic
14.8%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
6.2%
Good
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.7%
Good
6.5%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
16.1%
Exceptional
10.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
38.6%
Exceptional
22.1%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
55.8%
Exceptional
46.2%
Vision
Tragic
3.3%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.7%
Fair
3.0%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.8%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Tragic
8.2%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.8%
Poor
2.5%