Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 502,684,516 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.539. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.052% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 52.0 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($67,879 compared to $75,420, a difference of 11.1%), per capita income ($33,279 compared to $36,823, a difference of 10.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($79,816 compared to $87,219, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $53,265, a difference of 2.3%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 3.5%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $35,307, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 45.1%), single father poverty (22.4% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 36.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 28.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (14.2% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 0.57%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.89%), and receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 10.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 37.9%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 34.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 3.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 3.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 7.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 15.7%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 14.9%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.45 compared to 3.42, a difference of 0.75%), family households (66.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 14.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.7%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.010%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 4.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 46.5%), bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 30.1%, a difference of 14.2%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, under 1 year (56.6% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 0.54%), college, 1 year or more (50.2% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 0.95%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 59.0%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 48.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 3.4%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.8%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 7.1%).