Samoan vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,476,917 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Samoan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.528. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Samoans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.337% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Samoans corresponds to a decrease of 337.3 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,427 compared to $53,265, a difference of 22.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($101,580 compared to $87,219, a difference of 16.5%), and median family income ($100,344 compared to $86,989, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($37,498 compared to $35,307, a difference of 6.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,610 compared to $51,387, a difference of 6.3%), and median earnings ($44,206 compared to $41,049, a difference of 7.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 47.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 41.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 8.4%), single mother poverty (28.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 13.9%), and single female poverty (20.6% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 14.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 14.9%), and female unemployment (5.4% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 15.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.3% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.2% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.43%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.44%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.5% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 21.0%), births to unmarried women (32.6% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 13.9%), and married-couple households (48.7% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.42 compared to 3.42, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (29.5% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 0.63%), and family households (67.9% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 35.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (9.2% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 29.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.5% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 13.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (25.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 21.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 45.5%), college, under 1 year (63.0% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 11.8%), and college, 1 year or more (56.2% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of professional degree (3.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 0.83%), nursery school (97.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.1%), and kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Samoan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 16.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 11.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.050%), ambulatory disability (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.14%), and disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 0.48%).