Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Immigrants from Latin America
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Zimbabwe

Immigrants from Latin America

Exceptional
Poor
9,270
SOCIAL INDEX
90.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
24th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,392
SOCIAL INDEX
11.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
311th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Immigrants from Latin America Integration in Immigrants from Zimbabwe Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,718,720 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Immigrant from Zimbabwe communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Zimbabwe within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.813% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Zimbabwe corresponds to a decrease of 813.2 Immigrants from Latin America.
Immigrants from Zimbabwe Integration in Immigrants from Latin America Communities

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,394 compared to $36,823, a difference of 28.7%), median family income ($108,830 compared to $86,989, a difference of 25.1%), and median male earnings ($57,352 compared to $46,941, a difference of 22.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,914 compared to $51,387, a difference of 1.0%), wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 6.8%), and median female earnings ($41,527 compared to $35,307, a difference of 17.6%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Latin America
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$47,394
Tragic
$36,823
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$108,830
Tragic
$86,989
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$89,496
Tragic
$75,420
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$48,913
Tragic
$41,049
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$57,352
Tragic
$46,941
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,527
Tragic
$35,307
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Fair
$51,914
Poor
$51,387
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,880
Tragic
$82,166
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$104,992
Tragic
$87,219
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$63,643
Tragic
$53,265
Wage/Income Gap
Good
25.3%
Exceptional
23.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 65.7%), receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 57.6%), and family poverty (8.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 0.35%), single father poverty (16.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 7.4%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Latin America
Poverty
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.0%
Families
Exceptional
8.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
13.6%
Females
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
16.4%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.8%
Excellent
19.7%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.6%
Tragic
16.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.8%
Tragic
21.2%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Tragic
20.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.2%
Tragic
20.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Tragic
20.6%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
13.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.0%
Tragic
23.7%
Single Fathers
Good
16.1%
Fair
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.1%
Tragic
32.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
7.2%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
10.3%
Tragic
14.2%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.7%
Tragic
15.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
15.7%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.9% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 25.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 23.5%), and unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 0.79%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 12.2%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.0%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Latin America
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
5.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.1%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.3%
Tragic
19.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
11.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.1%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.2%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
5.3%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
5.8%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 75
Tragic
9.0%
Poor
9.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
8.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.0%
Tragic
9.6%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
6.4%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.9% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.8%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Latin America
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.8%
Poor
64.8%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.0%
Tragic
33.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
75.9%
Tragic
74.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Tragic
83.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.4%
Tragic
81.0%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 28.3%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.5%), and births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (46.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 3.7%), divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households (63.5% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 5.9%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Latin America
Family Households
Tragic
63.5%
Exceptional
67.2%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.8%
Exceptional
29.7%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Tragic
44.7%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.19
Exceptional
3.42
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.8%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.2%
Tragic
7.9%
Currently Married
Average
46.7%
Tragic
43.8%
Divorced or Separated
Excellent
11.9%
Tragic
12.4%
Births to Unmarried Women
Excellent
30.3%
Tragic
37.1%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 18.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.1% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.41%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Latin America
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.9%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.2%
Good
89.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Good
55.6%
Poor
54.3%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.1%
Exceptional
20.5%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.0%
Exceptional
7.1%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 76.3%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 67.6%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and 1st grade (98.1% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Latin America
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
3.3%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.7%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.7%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
96.5%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.0%
Tragic
96.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
97.8%
Tragic
95.7%
5th Grade
Exceptional
97.6%
Tragic
95.3%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.4%
Tragic
94.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
96.5%
Tragic
92.2%
8th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
91.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
95.5%
Tragic
90.4%
10th Grade
Exceptional
94.4%
Tragic
88.3%
11th Grade
Exceptional
93.4%
Tragic
86.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
92.1%
Tragic
85.0%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
90.3%
Tragic
82.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
87.1%
Tragic
78.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.9%
Tragic
56.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
63.3%
Tragic
50.7%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.5%
Tragic
37.9%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.6%
Tragic
30.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
11.3%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.3%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.3%

Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Zimbabwe and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 17.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (22.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.10%), disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Latin America Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ZimbabweImmigrants from Latin America
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Average
11.7%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Average
11.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Good
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Good
5.5%
Fair
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Fair
6.7%
Exceptional
6.3%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Fair
11.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.3%
Tragic
25.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.2%
Tragic
49.5%
Vision
Exceptional
2.1%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Good
3.0%
Exceptional
2.8%
Cognitive
Poor
17.5%
Tragic
17.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Poor
6.3%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%