Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 529,316,897 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Scotch-Irish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scotch-Irish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scotch-Irish corresponds to an increase of 49.7 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.5% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 20.0%), per capita income ($42,563 compared to $36,823, a difference of 15.6%), and median family income ($99,591 compared to $86,989, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,039 compared to $51,387, a difference of 4.8%), median female earnings ($37,383 compared to $35,307, a difference of 5.9%), and median household income ($80,972 compared to $75,420, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 59.6%), receiving food stamps (10.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 49.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 48.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (31.5% compared to 32.4%, a difference of 3.0%), single female poverty (22.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 3.4%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (14.8% compared to 16.0%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in female unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 26.9%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 24.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.7% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.72%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.5% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 22.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.3% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 0.71%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.5% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.75%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 30.8%), single father households (2.3% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 21.2%), and births to unmarried women (33.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 3.8%), family households (64.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and married-couple households (48.3% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 52.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.9% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 3.8%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.3% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 126.6%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 43.9%), and professional degree (4.3% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 30.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scotch-Irish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.0%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 35.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.41%), cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 2.9%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 3.6%).