Puget Sound Salish vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 46,037,186 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Puget Sound Salish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.278. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puget Sound Salish within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.049% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puget Sound Salish corresponds to a decrease of 49.3 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($53,704 compared to $46,941, a difference of 14.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($93,661 compared to $82,166, a difference of 14.0%), and median earnings ($46,333 compared to $41,049, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.3% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 6.8%), householder income under 25 years ($55,543 compared to $51,387, a difference of 8.1%), and median household income ($84,011 compared to $75,420, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 47.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 45.4%), and family poverty (8.4% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.8% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 5.9%), single father poverty (15.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.0% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 9.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 28.6%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.5%), and female unemployment (5.1% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.46%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 15.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.7% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (78.2% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 0.090%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.5% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 26.5%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 22.1%), and currently married (47.6% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.6% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 2.5%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 3.9%), and married-couple households (47.4% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (9.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 31.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (26.4% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 28.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.76%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 83.1%), college, under 1 year (63.9% compared to 56.3%, a difference of 13.5%), and college, 1 year or more (55.9% compared to 50.7%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of master's degree (11.1% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.2%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puget Sound Salish and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.9%), and disability age under 5 (0.97% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 0.090%), disability age over 75 (49.8% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 0.57%), and vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.1%).