Choctaw vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 267,504,894 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Choctaw communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.171. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Choctaw within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.022% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Choctaw corresponds to a decrease of 22.1 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 18.6%), householder income under 25 years ($45,450 compared to $51,387, a difference of 13.1%), and median household income ($69,947 compared to $75,420, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($53,060 compared to $53,265, a difference of 0.39%), median male earnings ($47,729 compared to $46,941, a difference of 1.7%), and median earnings ($40,270 compared to $41,049, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (20.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 26.5%), single male poverty (17.0% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (11.6% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 1.5%), female poverty (16.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 2.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.1% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 14.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 14.2%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.8% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.5% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.53%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.87%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 12.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (61.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.4% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.7% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 30-34 (81.4% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (14.1% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 13.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and average family size (3.21 compared to 3.42, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (36.9% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 0.73%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and married-couple households (46.0% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 31.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.0% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 11.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.2% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 2.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.3% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 9.1%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 9.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 81.5%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 10.9%), and high school diploma (87.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of associate's degree (37.8% compared to 37.9%, a difference of 0.22%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Choctaw and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (4.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 60.4%), disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 53.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (9.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 43.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 5.0%), disability age over 75 (52.7% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 6.4%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 14.1%).