Soviet Union vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 43,437,074 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.135. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 2.388% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to a decrease of 2,388.2 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $36,823, a difference of 47.2%), median family income ($119,262 compared to $86,989, a difference of 37.1%), and median male earnings ($63,382 compared to $46,941, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 2.1%), householder income under 25 years ($55,340 compared to $51,387, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $53,265, a difference of 18.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 47.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 21.2%, a difference of 44.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.7%, a difference of 1.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 35.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 34.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 31.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 2.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 74.1%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 55.5%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 54.6%), and births to unmarried women (26.3% compared to 37.1%, a difference of 41.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (44.6% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 0.040%), currently married (46.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.42, a difference of 9.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 68.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 61.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 8.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 18.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 44.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 99.1%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 90.3%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 82.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.3%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (0.95% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 29.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 24.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 22.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.9% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 1.3%), female disability (11.7% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.5%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 5.9%).