Nicaraguan vs Immigrants from Latin America Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 285,480,887 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America within Nicaraguan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.195. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Nicaraguans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.720% in Immigrants from Latin America. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Nicaraguans corresponds to an increase of 720.5 Immigrants from Latin America.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($39,372 compared to $36,823, a difference of 6.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,751 compared to $82,166, a difference of 6.8%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($92,554 compared to $87,219, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (23.4% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 1.3%), householder income over 65 years ($54,474 compared to $53,265, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income under 25 years ($53,275 compared to $51,387, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (18.2% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 13.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.2% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 12.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (18.4% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (16.1% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 3.0%), single father poverty (15.9% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (15.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 8.6%, a difference of 18.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 16.2%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 2.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.4% compared to 33.9%, a difference of 4.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.8% compared to 81.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 0.45%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 83.1%, a difference of 0.96%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.2% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 9.2%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 5.8%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.4% compared to 67.2%, a difference of 0.19%), currently married (44.2% compared to 43.8%, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (45.2% compared to 44.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 54.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.8%, a difference of 0.64%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 20.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 19.4%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 15.1%), and no schooling completed (2.9% compared to 3.3%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.1% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.35%), kindergarten (97.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 1st grade (97.0% compared to 96.7%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Nicaraguan and Immigrants from Latin America communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 12.5%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 7.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 1.2%), female disability (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (48.3% compared to 49.5%, a difference of 2.6%).