Portuguese vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 319,689,613 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.472. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.006% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 5.6 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 19.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $91,458, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $98,467, a difference of 7.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $61,157, a difference of 0.46%), median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $40,644, a difference of 1.2%), and per capita income ($44,362 compared to $43,838, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 20.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 16.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and single mother poverty (28.8% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.4%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.2% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 19.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 17.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 6.4%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.1% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 0.85%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (47.8% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 11.3%), births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and family households (65.8% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.080%), divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 0.40%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.88%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 29.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 21.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 9.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 17.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 20.4%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 18.4%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.5% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.020%), 10th grade (93.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 0.050%), and 5th grade (97.1% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 35.1%), hearing disability (3.5% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 24.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (23.5% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 0.30%), disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.3%).