French Canadian vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 336,542,026 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within French Canadian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.219. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in French Canadians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 French Canadians corresponds to a decrease of 9.2 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 23.0%), median female earnings ($38,436 compared to $40,644, a difference of 5.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($57,975 compared to $61,157, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,093 compared to $98,467, a difference of 0.64%), median family income ($101,634 compared to $102,451, a difference of 0.80%), and median household income ($82,810 compared to $84,299, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single father poverty (18.6% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 26.2%), married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 22.8%), and single male poverty (14.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 1.8%), child poverty under the age of 5 (17.7% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 1.9%), and single female poverty (22.2% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.4%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.4% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 17.1%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.69%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (43.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.0% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 7.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (78.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 0.71%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 0.93%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 13.2%), births to unmarried women (34.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 11.1%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), family households (63.7% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.07 compared to 3.22, a difference of 4.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 28.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 2.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.9% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 9.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 14.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 61.4%), professional degree (4.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between French Canadian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 57.2%), hearing disability (3.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 36.7%), and male disability (13.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 0.39%), disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 1.3%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.7%).