Russian vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 344,696,565 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.148. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.018% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 18.4 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 22.7%), per capita income ($53,154 compared to $43,838, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,398 compared to $91,458, a difference of 20.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $51,158, a difference of 6.3%), median female earnings ($44,169 compared to $40,644, a difference of 8.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $61,157, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 30.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 28.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 7.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.6% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 10.1%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 0.82%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.49%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 29.5%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.8%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 12.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.12 compared to 3.22, a difference of 2.9%), family households (63.4% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 15.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 45.2%), professional degree (6.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 31.7%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.78%), and 1st grade (98.3% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.79%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 14.4%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 13.9%), and cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 11.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.73%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.7%).