Puerto Rican vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 348,753,475 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Puerto Rican communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.123. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Puerto Ricans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Puerto Ricans corresponds to a decrease of 2.1 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($70,423 compared to $102,451, a difference of 45.5%), householder income over 65 years ($42,550 compared to $61,157, a difference of 43.7%), and median household income ($59,197 compared to $84,299, a difference of 42.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (18.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 22.0%), median female earnings ($31,560 compared to $40,644, a difference of 28.8%), and householder income under 25 years ($39,726 compared to $51,158, a difference of 28.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (12.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 142.1%), receiving food stamps (26.0% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 123.8%), and single father poverty (31.5% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 114.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (29.8% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 39.2%), single mother poverty (44.5% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 51.9%), and single female poverty (34.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 58.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 84.4%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 76.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (12.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 74.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 8.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (30.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 33.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (58.1% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 17.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (68.3% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (81.2% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 35-44 (80.7% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (80.4% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (45.7% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 47.5%), single mother households (8.7% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 27.8%), and divorced or separated (13.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.9%), family households (64.2% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 4.9%), and married-couple households (40.1% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 54.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (84.6% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 6.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.1% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 15.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 50.7%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 48.2%), and master's degree (11.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 46.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2nd grade (97.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.080%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Puerto Rican and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (3.9% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 89.3%), self-care disability (3.7% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 61.7%), and ambulatory disability (8.9% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 58.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (52.9% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.0%).