Brazilian vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,565,645 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Brazilian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.146. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Brazilians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.009% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Brazilians corresponds to a decrease of 9.4 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 17.1%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($98,267 compared to $91,458, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($46,700 compared to $43,838, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,483 compared to $40,644, a difference of 0.40%), householder income over 65 years ($61,465 compared to $61,157, a difference of 0.50%), and median earnings ($48,356 compared to $46,969, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 15.0%), child poverty among girls under 16 (15.4% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 14.8%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.2%), single mother poverty (28.3% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 3.7%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.040%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.1% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.5% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 7.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.6% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.8% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.7% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.2% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 9.5%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.8%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.020%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.0%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 6.6%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (53.8% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.0% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.15%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.4%), professional degree (5.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.7%), and college, under 1 year (65.9% compared to 67.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (96.9% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.29%), 5th grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.32%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.35%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Brazilian and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 21.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 8.1%), and cognitive disability (17.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.8% compared to 11.7%, a difference of 0.31%), disability (11.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and male disability (10.9% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 1.5%).