Turkish vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 226,780,694 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.023% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to a decrease of 22.7 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 21.3%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($110,318 compared to $91,458, a difference of 20.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $98,467, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $51,158, a difference of 6.1%), median female earnings ($44,695 compared to $40,644, a difference of 10.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $61,157, a difference of 11.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 31.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (13.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 30.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 29.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 3.6%), and single father poverty (15.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.3% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 7.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 4.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.15%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.29%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 24.9%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.6%), and births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.84%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.22, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (63.6% compared to 61.1%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 16.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 1.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.5%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.0%), and doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%), kindergarten (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.63%), and 1st grade (98.2% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.64%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 17.5%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.0% compared to 23.4%, a difference of 11.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (2.8% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 0.89%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 2.2%).