Native/Alaskan vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 340,346,829 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.509. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 14.6 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $43,838, a difference of 31.7%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $102,451, a difference of 26.6%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $84,299, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $51,158, a difference of 7.2%), wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 7.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($52,081 compared to $61,157, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (19.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 59.5%), married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 56.9%), and single father poverty (22.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 52.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 18.6%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 29.3%, a difference of 24.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 28.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 63.7%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 62.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.1%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 17.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 10.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 81.3%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 7.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 8.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 38.8%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.3%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (43.5% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 1.2%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and currently married (42.8% compared to 44.2%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 42.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.35%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 6.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 64.6%), professional degree (3.0% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 62.7%), and doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.030%), 8th grade (95.2% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.15%), and 6th grade (96.8% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.23%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 62.5%), hearing disability (4.2% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 50.5%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.3%), and disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 47.2%, a difference of 12.5%).