Argentinean vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 240,942,835 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.227. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.028% in Immigrants from Eastern Africa. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to a decrease of 28.2 Immigrants from Eastern Africa.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 18.2%), per capita income ($49,862 compared to $43,838, a difference of 13.7%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($103,111 compared to $91,458, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,952 compared to $40,644, a difference of 3.2%), householder income under 25 years ($54,154 compared to $51,158, a difference of 5.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $61,157, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (14.7% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 21.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.6% compared to 17.6%, a difference of 20.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (14.9% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 18.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 2.6%), single male poverty (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.3%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.7% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 11.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.7%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.80%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and female unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 21.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 77.5%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 68.5%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 0.75%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.9%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 85.4%, a difference of 0.92%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 17.0%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 13.0%), and married-couple households (47.5% compared to 42.9%, a difference of 10.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.060%), average family size (3.23 compared to 3.22, a difference of 0.34%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 11.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 7.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 53.7%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 18.0%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 23.2%), no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.8%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.5% compared to 95.3%, a difference of 0.26%), 7th grade (95.9% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Immigrants from Eastern Africa communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 20.9%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 15.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 0.47%), self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.5% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%).