Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Cape Verdean
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Cape Verdeans

Excellent
Poor
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,263
SOCIAL INDEX
10.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
317th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Cape Verdean Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,467,435 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.040% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to an increase of 39.6 Cape Verdeans.
Luxembourger Integration in Cape Verdean Communities

Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $50,077, a difference of 21.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $87,580, a difference of 18.2%), and wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 16.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $51,387, a difference of 2.0%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $38,614, a difference of 3.3%), and median earnings ($47,640 compared to $44,640, a difference of 6.7%).
Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerCape Verdean
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$39,935
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$91,848
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$75,848
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$44,640
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$51,103
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$38,614
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Poor
$51,387
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$85,758
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$87,580
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$50,077
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
23.6%

Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 130.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 58.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 55.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.4% compared to 13.8%, a difference of 3.5%), single father poverty (17.1% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 3.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 7.3%).
Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerCape Verdean
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.4%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
10.9%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Exceptional
19.4%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
16.3%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
19.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
18.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
18.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
19.2%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
13.8%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
22.3%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Fair
16.5%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
30.8%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Fair
5.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
14.7%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
16.8%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
21.1%

Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.5% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 56.9%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 52.2%), and unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 50.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 11.5%).
Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerCape Verdean
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
7.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
12.9%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Average
17.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.4%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
5.5%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
11.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Exceptional
5.9%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
5.9%

Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.9% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.25%), in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 0.78%).
Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerCape Verdean
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Exceptional
66.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Exceptional
80.0%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
44.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Exceptional
78.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Exceptional
86.0%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Exceptional
85.6%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.1%

Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 59.3%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 40.4%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.26%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.17, a difference of 2.1%), and family households (63.3% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 2.4%).
Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerCape Verdean
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
61.8%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
26.9%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
38.1%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Tragic
3.17
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.9%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
39.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.1%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
41.3%

Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 190.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 50.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 12.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 26.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 39.2%).
Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerCape Verdean
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
15.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
84.5%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
46.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
15.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
4.4%

Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 95.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 37.3%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 34.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%).
Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerCape Verdean
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Tragic
3.1%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
97.0%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.9%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.8%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Tragic
96.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
96.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
95.5%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
95.1%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
94.1%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
93.5%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
92.2%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
90.8%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
89.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
87.4%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
85.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
80.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
56.0%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
50.3%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
38.8%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
30.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.1%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.4%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.4%

Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 38.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 33.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 32.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 3.4%), disability age over 75 (44.8% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 11.8%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 12.3%).
Luxembourger vs Cape Verdean Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerCape Verdean
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.5%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.8%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.7%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
7.0%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.7%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
14.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
25.4%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
50.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.4%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Poor
3.1%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
19.2%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.9%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
3.0%