Pima vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 36,623,823 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.921. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.050% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 50.2 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $39,935, a difference of 30.3%), median male earnings ($42,357 compared to $51,103, a difference of 20.6%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $75,848, a difference of 19.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,503 compared to $51,387, a difference of 0.23%), householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $50,077, a difference of 0.92%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $85,758, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 113.5%), family poverty (18.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 67.8%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (29.7% compared to 18.7%, a difference of 58.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (19.0% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 11.1%), single father poverty (14.8% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 11.7%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 25.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 126.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 98.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 79.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 8.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (6.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 13.0%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (6.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 13.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 30.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 16.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 24.6%), and average family size (3.75 compared to 3.17, a difference of 18.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 0.57%), divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and family households (65.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 78.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 46.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 2.1%), no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 46.5%), bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 33.1%), and master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (91.2% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 0.44%), 11th grade (88.3% compared to 89.1%, a difference of 0.90%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 56.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 51.9%), and vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 36.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.7% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 0.41%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.53%), and disability (13.7% compared to 13.5%, a difference of 1.5%).