Immigrants from Latin America vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 106,953,435 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.023. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to an increase of 0.5 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $38,614, a difference of 9.4%), median male earnings ($46,941 compared to $51,103, a difference of 8.9%), and median earnings ($41,049 compared to $44,640, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $51,387, a difference of 0.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,219 compared to $87,580, a difference of 0.41%), and median household income ($75,420 compared to $75,848, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 34.8%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 34.4%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (21.2% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.67%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (16.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 44.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 27.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.3% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.73%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.6% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 3.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 31.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 5.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in married-couple households (44.7% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 17.1%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 11.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.8% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 5.6%), divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 5.8%), and average family size (3.42 compared to 3.17, a difference of 8.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 62.4%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 50.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 16.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 37.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 10.9%), master's degree (11.3% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 7.2%), and no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.24%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 35.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 0.58%), vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.66%), and disability age over 75 (49.5% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 1.2%).