Immigrants from El Salvador vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 97,859,885 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.396. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to an increase of 16.2 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($58,226 compared to $50,077, a difference of 16.3%), median household income ($81,213 compared to $75,848, a difference of 7.1%), and median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $51,103, a difference of 6.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($92,545 compared to $91,848, a difference of 0.76%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,913 compared to $85,758, a difference of 1.3%), and wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 56.6%), married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.7%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of poverty (14.3% compared to 14.4%, a difference of 0.52%), single female poverty (22.4% compared to 22.3%, a difference of 0.65%), and female poverty (15.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 36.3%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 30.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.2% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.95%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 29.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 2.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 16.1%), married-couple households (44.3% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 16.1%), and births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 13.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.9% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 0.010%), family households (67.0% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 8.5%), and currently married (43.1% compared to 39.6%, a difference of 9.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 75.7%), no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 49.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 18.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 43.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 25.1%), high school diploma (80.8% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and 10th grade (86.8% compared to 90.8%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 0.14%), college, under 1 year (56.4% compared to 56.0%, a difference of 0.63%), and master's degree (12.0% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 52.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 32.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 31.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 1.4%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 2.2%), and cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 9.2%).