Asian vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 101,980,938 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Asian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.261. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Asians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Asians corresponds to a decrease of 2.4 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Asian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($68,822 compared to $50,077, a difference of 37.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($118,426 compared to $87,580, a difference of 35.2%), and median household income ($101,681 compared to $75,848, a difference of 34.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,003 compared to $51,387, a difference of 10.9%), wage/income gap (26.9% compared to 23.6%, a difference of 14.2%), and median female earnings ($44,586 compared to $38,614, a difference of 15.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Asian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.7% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 117.6%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 43.2%), and family poverty (7.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 41.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.2% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 6.9%), single father poverty (14.6% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 13.3%), and married-couple family poverty (4.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Asian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 49.5%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 40.2%), and male unemployment (5.1% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 40.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 3.8%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Asian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 30.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.2% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.24%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.2% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.54%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.6%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Asian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 58.3%), births to unmarried women (26.8% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 54.3%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 40.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.28 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.5%), family households (66.5% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 7.7%), and family households with children (29.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Asian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.0% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 73.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 59.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 38.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 7.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 38.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Asian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 68.0%), professional degree (5.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 63.9%), and master's degree (18.4% compared to 12.1%, a difference of 52.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.70%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.71%), and nursery school (97.6% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Asian and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 52.9%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 50.7%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.9% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 6.8%), hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 14.5%), and cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 14.7%).