Immigrants from Oceania vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 88,087,931 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Immigrant from Oceania communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.859. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Oceania within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.025% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Oceania corresponds to a decrease of 25.2 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,416 compared to $50,077, a difference of 28.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,705 compared to $87,580, a difference of 18.4%), and median household income ($89,100 compared to $75,848, a difference of 17.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,297 compared to $38,614, a difference of 4.4%), householder income under 25 years ($53,680 compared to $51,387, a difference of 4.5%), and median earnings ($47,617 compared to $44,640, a difference of 6.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (11.4% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 85.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 43.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 40.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 6.4%), and single father poverty (15.4% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 37.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 34.3%), and male unemployment (5.3% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.1%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 8.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 17.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.3% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.80%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 41.0%), births to unmarried women (30.6% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 35.1%), and married-couple households (46.9% compared to 38.1%, a difference of 23.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.9%), family households with children (28.1% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and family households (64.9% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 73.4%), no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 60.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.5% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 23.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 45.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 38.2%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 35.9%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.89%), 1st grade (97.8% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.89%), and nursery school (97.8% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Oceania and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 28.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.4% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 1.5%), disability age over 75 (48.0% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 6.1%).