Immigrants from Costa Rica vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 78,544,852 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Immigrant from Costa Rica communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.320. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Costa Rica within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.080% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Costa Rica corresponds to a decrease of 80.3 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,848 compared to $50,077, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($100,141 compared to $87,580, a difference of 14.3%), and median household income ($85,054 compared to $75,848, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,186 compared to $38,614, a difference of 1.5%), householder income under 25 years ($52,643 compared to $51,387, a difference of 2.4%), and median earnings ($45,928 compared to $44,640, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 73.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.3% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.8% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.3% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 1.5%), married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 19.4%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.7% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 38.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 35.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.5% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 0.37%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 0.70%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.6% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 25.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.9% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.2% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.39%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 86.0%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 31.6%), births to unmarried women (33.4% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 23.9%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 22.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.26 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.0%), family households with children (28.3% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and family households (65.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 51.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 47.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.4% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 18.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 31.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 35.0%), professional degree (4.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 30.5%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.80%), and nursery school (97.7% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.81%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Costa Rica and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.7% compared to 14.1%, a difference of 31.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.8% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 7.0%), hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 8.9%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 11.1%).