Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar vs Cape Verdean Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 70,414,075 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Cape Verdeans within Immigrant from Burma/Myanmar communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.218. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.016% in Cape Verdeans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar corresponds to a decrease of 15.6 Cape Verdeans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($57,114 compared to $50,077, a difference of 14.1%), householder income under 25 years ($48,749 compared to $51,387, a difference of 5.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($91,385 compared to $87,580, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,827 compared to $39,935, a difference of 0.27%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,736 compared to $85,758, a difference of 1.1%), and median earnings ($43,998 compared to $44,640, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 21.1%, a difference of 63.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 39.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.3% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 30.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.21%), male poverty (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.39%), and single mother poverty (30.6% compared to 30.8%, a difference of 0.87%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.7% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 47.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.5% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 44.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 42.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.43%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.8%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (15.6% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.0% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 14.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.3% compared to 78.3%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 82.1%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 66.6%, a difference of 0.39%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 80.0%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 41.3%, a difference of 25.7%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 25.6%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.6% compared to 61.8%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.29 compared to 3.17, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (28.0% compared to 26.9%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 15.6%, a difference of 49.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 84.5%, a difference of 6.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.9% compared to 46.8%, a difference of 15.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 25.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.7% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 18.5%), professional degree (3.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 17.5%), and bachelor's degree (35.5% compared to 30.9%, a difference of 14.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (96.3% compared to 96.2%, a difference of 0.050%), 3rd grade (96.6% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 0.070%), and nursery school (96.9% compared to 97.0%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar and Cape Verdean communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.7%, a difference of 47.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.9%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 50.1%, a difference of 4.7%), cognitive disability (18.2% compared to 19.2%, a difference of 5.4%), and disability age 65 to 74 (24.0% compared to 25.4%, a difference of 5.8%).