Immigrants from South Central Asia vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 421,139,469 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Africans within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.002% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 1.8 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($116,626 compared to $78,986, a difference of 47.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $84,925, a difference of 46.2%), and median household income ($106,057 compared to $72,650, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $46,838, a difference of 23.4%), median female earnings ($46,324 compared to $36,530, a difference of 26.8%), and wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 27.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 73.3%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 72.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 72.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 19.7%), single father poverty (14.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 26.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.6% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 29.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 38.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.1% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 36.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.7%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 9.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 1.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 60.9%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 51.5%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.78%), family households (66.4% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 6.9%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 43.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 4.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 4.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and African communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 67.6%), master's degree (20.7% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 60.8%), and professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 60.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.18%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 53.3%), vision disability (1.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 42.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (16.4% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 14.0%), and hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 18.0%).