Luxembourger vs African Community Comparison

COMPARE

Luxembourger
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
African
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Luxembourgers

Africans

Excellent
Tragic
9,215
SOCIAL INDEX
89.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
27th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
624
SOCIAL INDEX
3.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
341st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

African Integration in Luxembourger Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 134,001,626 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Africans within Luxembourger communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.531. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Luxembourgers within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.184% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Luxembourgers corresponds to a decrease of 184.2 Africans.
Luxembourger Integration in African Communities

Luxembourger vs African Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($97,237 compared to $78,986, a difference of 23.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,536 compared to $84,925, a difference of 21.9%), and median family income ($106,183 compared to $87,820, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,379 compared to $46,838, a difference of 7.6%), median female earnings ($39,891 compared to $36,530, a difference of 9.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($60,967 compared to $53,711, a difference of 13.5%).
Luxembourger vs African Income
Income MetricLuxembourgerAfrican
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$45,663
Tragic
$37,785
Median Family Income
Excellent
$106,183
Tragic
$87,820
Median Household Income
Good
$86,418
Tragic
$72,650
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,640
Tragic
$41,955
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$56,300
Tragic
$47,994
Median Female Earnings
Average
$39,891
Tragic
$36,530
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$50,379
Tragic
$46,838
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,237
Tragic
$78,986
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,536
Tragic
$84,925
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Average
$60,967
Tragic
$53,711
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.4%
Exceptional
22.9%

Luxembourger vs African Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 65.6%), family poverty (7.2% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 63.1%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.6% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 59.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.1% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 7.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 9.5%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 10.3%).
Luxembourger vs African Poverty
Poverty MetricLuxembourgerAfrican
Poverty
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
15.6%
Families
Exceptional
7.2%
Tragic
11.8%
Males
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
16.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
20.9%
Tragic
22.8%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.1%
Tragic
17.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.9%
Tragic
22.8%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.6%
Tragic
21.7%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.8%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
14.3%
Tragic
21.9%
Single Males
Tragic
13.4%
Tragic
14.7%
Single Females
Excellent
20.4%
Tragic
24.8%
Single Fathers
Tragic
17.1%
Tragic
18.3%
Single Mothers
Excellent
28.5%
Tragic
33.3%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
6.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.2%
Tragic
12.6%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
13.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
15.1%

Luxembourger vs African Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment (4.3% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 39.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 38.2%), and male unemployment (4.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 37.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 4.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 8.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 14.0%).
Luxembourger vs African Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLuxembourgerAfrican
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
6.1%
Males
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
6.3%
Females
Exceptional
4.4%
Tragic
5.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
10.0%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Tragic
19.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
11.5%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
7.6%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
6.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.1%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Poor
5.5%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.8%
Poor
5.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.7%
Tragic
9.1%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.6%
Tragic
9.2%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
10.4%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
6.5%

Luxembourger vs African Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.3% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 19.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (85.0% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 5.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (79.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 3.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (86.4% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 4.2%).
Luxembourger vs African Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLuxembourgerAfrican
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.6%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
81.9%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
45.3%
Exceptional
38.0%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
79.0%
Average
75.0%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.9%
Tragic
83.2%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.6%
Tragic
83.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
86.4%
Tragic
82.9%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
80.5%

Luxembourger vs African Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 47.1%), births to unmarried women (29.4% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 34.9%), and married-couple households (48.5% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 18.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.53%), family households (63.3% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.8%), and average family size (3.10 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.9%).
Luxembourger vs African Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLuxembourgerAfrican
Family Households
Tragic
63.3%
Tragic
62.1%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
27.0%
Poor
27.2%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
40.9%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.10
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.5%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
8.2%
Currently Married
Exceptional
49.3%
Tragic
41.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.4%
Tragic
39.7%

Luxembourger vs African Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (5.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 130.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 14.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (94.8% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 8.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 13.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (59.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 14.0%).
Luxembourger vs African Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLuxembourgerAfrican
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
12.3%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
94.8%
Tragic
87.8%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.1%
Tragic
51.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.9%
Tragic
18.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
6.6%
Tragic
5.8%

Luxembourger vs African Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 37.3%), professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 25.7%), and doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.67%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.68%).
Luxembourger vs African Education Level
Education Level MetricLuxembourgerAfrican
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.6%
Fair
2.2%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.9%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.8%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Poor
97.8%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Poor
97.7%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.3%
Poor
97.6%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Poor
97.4%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Poor
97.2%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Poor
96.9%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Poor
95.8%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Poor
95.4%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.3%
Tragic
94.5%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.4%
Tragic
93.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.5%
Tragic
91.5%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.3%
Tragic
89.6%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
91.7%
Tragic
87.5%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
88.6%
Tragic
83.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
68.2%
Tragic
61.1%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
62.1%
Tragic
55.0%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
48.9%
Tragic
41.1%
Bachelor's Degree
Excellent
39.8%
Tragic
32.9%
Master's Degree
Good
15.3%
Tragic
12.9%
Professional Degree
Good
4.6%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Excellent
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Luxembourger vs African Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Luxembourger and African communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (1.9% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.0%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.6% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 28.3%), and ambulatory disability (5.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 4.0%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 6.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 7.8%).
Luxembourger vs African Disability
Disability MetricLuxembourgerAfrican
Disability
Exceptional
11.3%
Tragic
13.0%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.6%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.4%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
6.5%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
7.4%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.6%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Tragic
26.2%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
44.8%
Tragic
48.9%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Fair
3.0%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.4%
Tragic
18.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
7.0%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
2.7%