Pima vs African Community Comparison
COMPARE
Pima
African
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Pima
Africans
1,700
SOCIAL INDEX
14.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
291st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
624
SOCIAL INDEX
3.8/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
341st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
African Integration in Pima Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,114,204 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Africans within Pima communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.754. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pima within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.021% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pima corresponds to an increase of 21.2 Africans.
Pima vs African Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($30,644 compared to $37,785, a difference of 23.3%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($73,365 compared to $84,925, a difference of 15.8%), and median household income ($63,262 compared to $72,650, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($35,326 compared to $36,530, a difference of 3.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,821 compared to $78,986, a difference of 4.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($50,539 compared to $53,711, a difference of 6.3%).
Income Metric | Pima | African |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $30,644 | Tragic $37,785 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $77,431 | Tragic $87,820 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,262 | Tragic $72,650 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,285 | Tragic $41,955 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,357 | Tragic $47,994 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,326 | Tragic $36,530 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,503 | Tragic $46,838 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,821 | Tragic $78,986 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $73,365 | Tragic $84,925 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $50,539 | Tragic $53,711 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 21.1% | Exceptional 22.9% |
Pima vs African Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (11.4% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 91.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (23.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 75.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (19.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 16.0%), child poverty under the age of 5 (27.4% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and single female poverty (30.3% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 22.5%).
Poverty Metric | Pima | African |
Poverty | Tragic 21.9% | Tragic 15.6% |
Families | Tragic 18.4% | Tragic 11.8% |
Males | Tragic 20.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Females | Tragic 23.6% | Tragic 16.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 28.4% | Tragic 22.8% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 25.3% | Tragic 17.0% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 27.4% | Tragic 22.8% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 29.0% | Tragic 21.7% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 29.7% | Tragic 21.7% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 28.2% | Tragic 21.9% |
Single Males | Tragic 20.2% | Tragic 14.7% |
Single Females | Tragic 30.3% | Tragic 24.8% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 14.8% | Tragic 18.3% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 33.3% |
Married Couples | Tragic 11.4% | Tragic 6.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 19.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 23.9% | Tragic 13.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 19.0% | Tragic 15.1% |
Pima vs African Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (11.8% compared to 5.6%, a difference of 110.4%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (18.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 81.5%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (11.7% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 78.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 4.1%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (23.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 18.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Pima | African |
Unemployment | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 6.1% |
Males | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Females | Tragic 9.3% | Tragic 5.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 16.2% | Tragic 13.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 19.5% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 14.2% | Tragic 11.5% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 7.6% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 9.6% | Tragic 6.4% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 11.8% | Tragic 5.6% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 6.4% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 6.6% | Tragic 5.1% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Excellent 4.8% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 6.6% | Poor 5.5% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 6.3% | Poor 5.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 9.1% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 9.2% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 18.9% | Tragic 10.4% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 6.5% |
Pima vs African Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (69.0% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 12.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (57.4% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 12.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (74.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.0% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (69.0% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (72.8% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 10.5%).
Labor Participation Metric | Pima | African |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 57.4% | Tragic 64.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 69.0% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 34.1% | Exceptional 38.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Tragic 69.0% | Average 75.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 74.3% | Tragic 83.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 79.0% | Tragic 83.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 74.8% | Tragic 82.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 72.8% | Tragic 80.5% |
Pima vs African Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in single father households (4.2% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 70.2%), births to unmarried women (51.5% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 29.6%), and currently married (35.9% compared to 41.8%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.22%), single mother households (8.3% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 1.3%), and divorced or separated (12.9% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 2.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Pima | African |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Tragic 62.1% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 27.1% | Poor 27.2% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 35.6% | Tragic 40.9% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.75 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 2.5% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 8.3% | Tragic 8.2% |
Currently Married | Tragic 35.9% | Tragic 41.8% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.9% | Tragic 13.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 51.5% | Tragic 39.7% |
Pima vs African Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 34.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 21.2%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (52.0% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 0.36%), 1 or more vehicles in household (86.3% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and no vehicles in household (14.1% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.7%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Pima | African |
No Vehicles Available | Tragic 14.1% | Tragic 12.3% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 86.3% | Tragic 87.8% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 52.0% | Tragic 51.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 18.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.9% | Tragic 5.8% |
Pima vs African Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in bachelor's degree (23.2% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 41.7%), master's degree (9.2% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 39.3%), and associate's degree (30.2% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 36.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (95.6% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.15%), 7th grade (96.1% compared to 95.8%, a difference of 0.33%), and 6th grade (97.2% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 0.38%).
Education Level Metric | Pima | African |
No Schooling Completed | Average 2.1% | Fair 2.2% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.9% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.8% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.2% | Poor 97.7% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.0% | Poor 97.6% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 97.7% | Poor 97.4% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 97.6% | Poor 97.2% |
6th Grade | Excellent 97.2% | Poor 96.9% |
7th Grade | Good 96.1% | Poor 95.8% |
8th Grade | Fair 95.6% | Poor 95.4% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.9% | Tragic 94.5% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.2% | Tragic 93.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 88.3% | Tragic 91.5% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Tragic 89.6% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 81.6% | Tragic 87.5% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 76.4% | Tragic 83.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 51.4% | Tragic 61.1% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 45.6% | Tragic 55.0% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 30.2% | Tragic 41.1% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 23.2% | Tragic 32.9% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 9.2% | Tragic 12.9% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Pima vs African Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pima and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (38.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 47.2%), vision disability (3.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 31.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 29.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 0.78%), self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 2.0%), and male disability (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 2.1%).
Disability Metric | Pima | African |
Disability | Tragic 13.7% | Tragic 13.0% |
Males | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.8% | Tragic 13.4% |
Age | Under 5 years | Exceptional 1.1% | Tragic 1.4% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.2% | Tragic 6.5% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.7% | Tragic 7.4% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 16.1% | Tragic 13.6% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 38.6% | Tragic 26.2% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 55.8% | Tragic 48.9% |
Vision | Tragic 3.3% | Tragic 2.5% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.7% | Fair 3.0% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.8% | Tragic 18.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 8.2% | Tragic 7.0% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.8% | Tragic 2.7% |