Scottish vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 461,627,833 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Africans within Scottish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.940. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Scottish within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.945% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Scottish corresponds to an increase of 945.3 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Scottish and African communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 27.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($102,123 compared to $84,925, a difference of 20.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($94,622 compared to $78,986, a difference of 19.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,397 compared to $36,530, a difference of 5.1%), householder income under 25 years ($50,554 compared to $46,838, a difference of 7.9%), and median earnings ($46,463 compared to $41,955, a difference of 10.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Scottish and African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 53.2%), family poverty (7.9% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 48.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.0% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 44.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (17.7% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 3.2%), single male poverty (14.0% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 5.4%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Scottish and African communities in the United States are seen in male unemployment (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 30.2%), unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 29.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Scottish and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 10.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 0.96%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.9% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.9% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Scottish and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 42.1%), births to unmarried women (31.7% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 25.2%), and married-couple households (49.0% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.42%), family households (64.5% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 3.8%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Scottish and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 82.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 27.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (93.4% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 6.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (61.2% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 18.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Scottish and African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 54.2%), doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 26.4%), and professional degree (4.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 24.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.83%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.83%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.84%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Scottish and African communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.7% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 22.7%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.6% compared to 26.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (12.9% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 1.0%), male disability (12.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 1.5%), and female disability (13.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 3.2%).