Immigrants from Philippines vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 416,582,999 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Africans within Immigrant from Philippines communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Philippines within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Philippines corresponds to an increase of 8.9 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and African communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($102,910 compared to $78,986, a difference of 30.3%), median household income ($93,899 compared to $72,650, a difference of 29.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($108,471 compared to $84,925, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.6%), median female earnings ($41,114 compared to $36,530, a difference of 12.6%), and median earnings ($48,266 compared to $41,955, a difference of 15.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and African communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 55.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 52.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.4% compared to 21.9%, a difference of 51.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.9% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 14.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 20.9%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 27.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 21.7%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.1% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 8.2%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.9% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 3.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.8% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.1% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.20%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.6% compared to 83.4%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 34.3%), births to unmarried women (30.4% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 30.5%), and married-couple households (49.3% compared to 40.9%, a difference of 20.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 3.2%), average family size (3.37 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.7%), and family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 46.4%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 44.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 4.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (60.1% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 16.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (23.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 30.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and African communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 18.2%), bachelor's degree (36.4% compared to 32.9%, a difference of 10.7%), and associate's degree (45.0% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (91.5% compared to 91.5%, a difference of 0.070%), nursery school (97.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and kindergarten (97.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Philippines and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.4% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 30.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 29.6%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.17%), hearing disability (3.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 1.3%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 6.0%).