New Zealander vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 103,305,217 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Africans within New Zealander communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.033. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in New Zealanders within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.016% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 New Zealanders corresponds to an increase of 15.8 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between New Zealander and African communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,575 compared to $37,785, a difference of 33.9%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($105,085 compared to $78,986, a difference of 33.0%), and median family income ($115,230 compared to $87,820, a difference of 31.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,294 compared to $46,838, a difference of 13.8%), median female earnings ($42,446 compared to $36,530, a difference of 16.2%), and wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between New Zealander and African communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.9% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 52.5%), family poverty (8.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 45.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (15.3% compared to 21.7%, a difference of 42.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.7% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 5.3%), single father poverty (16.6% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 10.2%), and single male poverty (13.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 11.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between New Zealander and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 27.9%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.0% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 26.7%), and male unemployment (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between New Zealander and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (82.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 2.6%), in labor force | age 20-64 (79.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (38.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.2% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between New Zealander and African communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.6% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 45.5%), births to unmarried women (30.3% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 30.9%), and single father households (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.1% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 0.19%), family households (62.9% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and African communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 21.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.0%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.7% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between New Zealander and African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 62.2%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 59.7%), and master's degree (18.3% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 41.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.4% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.58%), kindergarten (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.58%), and 1st grade (98.4% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.59%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between New Zealander and African communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 23.8%), vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 21.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 4.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.0% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 5.5%), and disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 5.8%).