Lumbee vs African Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 89,765,656 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Africans within Lumbee communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.256. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lumbee within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.035% in Africans. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lumbee corresponds to a decrease of 35.3 Africans.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lumbee and African communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($34,584 compared to $46,838, a difference of 35.4%), median household income ($54,644 compared to $72,650, a difference of 33.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($40,550 compared to $53,711, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (21.3% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 7.6%), median female earnings ($32,500 compared to $36,530, a difference of 12.4%), and median earnings ($36,876 compared to $41,955, a difference of 13.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lumbee and African communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (25.2% compared to 14.7%, a difference of 70.8%), single father poverty (28.5% compared to 18.3%, a difference of 55.5%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (26.3% compared to 17.0%, a difference of 54.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (43.2% compared to 33.3%, a difference of 30.0%), single female poverty (33.0% compared to 24.8%, a difference of 33.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (31.1% compared to 22.8%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lumbee and African communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (13.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 50.5%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (13.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 48.0%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (11.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 47.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (5.9% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (13.3% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (19.1% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lumbee and African communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.0% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (65.5% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 14.4%), and in labor force | age > 16 (56.8% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 13.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (78.3% compared to 83.2%, a difference of 6.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (75.6% compared to 80.5%, a difference of 6.5%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (77.0% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 7.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lumbee and African communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (48.2% compared to 39.7%, a difference of 21.4%), single father households (2.8% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 13.2%), and single mother households (9.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 11.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (63.1% compared to 62.1%, a difference of 1.5%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.0%), and family households with children (26.3% compared to 27.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and African communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 50.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 27.4%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 87.8%, a difference of 2.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.9% compared to 51.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.3% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 19.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lumbee and African communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.5% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 49.1%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 44.0%), and doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (94.4% compared to 94.5%, a difference of 0.13%), 8th grade (96.0% compared to 95.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.66%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lumbee and African communities in the United States are seen in ambulatory disability (9.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 36.9%), hearing disability (4.1% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 34.9%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 33.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (7.4% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 0.58%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 1.6%), and cognitive disability (19.1% compared to 18.6%, a difference of 2.6%).