Latvian vs Yakama Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Yakama
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Yakama

Exceptional
Poor
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
1,331
SOCIAL INDEX
10.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
315th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Yakama Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 14,433,775 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Yakama within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.118% in Yakama. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to a decrease of 118.0 Yakama.
Latvian Integration in Yakama Communities

Latvian vs Yakama Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $33,009, a difference of 59.5%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $83,932, a difference of 43.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $76,226, a difference of 42.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $54,321, a difference of 2.9%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.7%, a difference of 17.3%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $56,234, a difference of 19.7%).
Latvian vs Yakama Income
Income MetricLatvianYakama
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Tragic
$33,009
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Tragic
$83,932
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Tragic
$72,225
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Tragic
$39,107
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Tragic
$45,002
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Tragic
$33,354
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Exceptional
$54,321
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Tragic
$76,226
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Tragic
$86,992
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Tragic
$56,234
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Exceptional
23.7%

Latvian vs Yakama Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 21.4%, a difference of 134.9%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 9.0%, a difference of 129.8%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 84.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 10.1%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 25.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 30.1%).
Latvian vs Yakama Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianYakama
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Tragic
16.7%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Tragic
15.3%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Tragic
18.0%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Tragic
25.3%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Tragic
17.6%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Tragic
23.1%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Tragic
22.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Tragic
21.7%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Tragic
22.6%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
15.9%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Tragic
28.3%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Tragic
18.1%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Tragic
36.4%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Tragic
9.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Tragic
14.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
18.3%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Tragic
21.4%

Latvian vs Yakama Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 114.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 95.4%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 92.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 2.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 15.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 24.5%).
Latvian vs Yakama Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianYakama
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
7.3%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Tragic
7.9%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
6.7%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Tragic
15.6%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Tragic
22.5%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
8.8%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Tragic
9.8%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.6%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Tragic
8.9%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Tragic
6.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Tragic
6.6%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
6.7%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Tragic
9.9%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Tragic
8.1%

Latvian vs Yakama Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 8.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 79.0%, a difference of 8.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.1%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.6%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.9%, a difference of 5.4%).
Latvian vs Yakama Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianYakama
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Tragic
62.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
75.8%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Good
36.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Average
75.1%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Tragic
80.6%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Tragic
79.1%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Tragic
79.0%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Tragic
80.6%

Latvian vs Yakama Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 108.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 59.2%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 40.3%, a difference of 45.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 45.2%, a difference of 5.9%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 44.0%, a difference of 10.2%).
Latvian vs Yakama Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianYakama
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Exceptional
69.3%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Exceptional
30.8%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Tragic
45.2%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Exceptional
3.45
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
4.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
8.4%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Tragic
44.0%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Tragic
40.3%

Latvian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 12.9%, a difference of 111.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 31.0%, a difference of 60.7%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 93.6%, a difference of 3.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 48.1%).
Latvian vs Yakama Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianYakama
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
6.6%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
93.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Exceptional
64.9%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Exceptional
31.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Exceptional
12.9%

Latvian vs Yakama Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 130.4%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 109.4%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 102.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.6%, a difference of 2.0%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.5%, a difference of 2.0%).
Latvian vs Yakama Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianYakama
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Tragic
3.6%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.6%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Tragic
96.5%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
96.4%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Tragic
95.9%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Tragic
95.2%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Tragic
94.8%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Tragic
94.3%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Tragic
91.7%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Tragic
91.2%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Tragic
90.1%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Tragic
86.9%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Tragic
85.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Tragic
82.5%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Tragic
80.0%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Tragic
74.5%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Tragic
52.6%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
46.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Tragic
32.3%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Tragic
24.5%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Tragic
9.5%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Tragic
3.1%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Tragic
1.3%

Latvian vs Yakama Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Yakama communities in the United States are seen in disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 29.6%, a difference of 39.6%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.6%, a difference of 33.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.00%, a difference of 31.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 18.1%, a difference of 8.8%), female disability (11.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 12.8%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 51.3%, a difference of 13.7%).
Latvian vs Yakama Disability
Disability MetricLatvianYakama
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
13.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
13.2%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
1.00%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
9.0%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.6%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Tragic
29.6%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Tragic
51.3%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Tragic
2.5%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.9%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Tragic
18.1%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Tragic
6.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Tragic
2.7%