Latvian vs Immigrants from Western Europe Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 216,023,182 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Europe within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.373. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.140% in Immigrants from Western Europe. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 139.6 Immigrants from Western Europe.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($120,301 compared to $112,688, a difference of 6.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $108,824, a difference of 6.6%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $102,654, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $52,957, a difference of 0.33%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.8%, a difference of 0.42%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $64,933, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 19.0%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 8.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 15.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 2.9%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 3.9%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.7%, a difference of 13.4%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 10.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 37.5%, a difference of 3.6%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.1%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 75.3%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.1%, a difference of 12.0%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 9.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.20%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.2%, a difference of 0.72%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.14, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 11.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.2%, a difference of 1.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.9%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 17.8%, a difference of 11.2%), and bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 9.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Western Europe communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.4%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.37%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.2%, a difference of 2.3%).