Latvian vs Scottish Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 220,352,886 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.227% in Scottish. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 226.9 Scottish.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $44,440, a difference of 18.5%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $104,288, a difference of 15.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $94,622, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,554, a difference of 4.4%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 29.1%, a difference of 4.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $61,735, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 17.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 16.4%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 10.5%, a difference of 3.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 3.0%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.9%, a difference of 7.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 17.7%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 16.8%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 9.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.25%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.68%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 42.0%, a difference of 8.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 63.9%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 84.2%, a difference of 2.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.9%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.6%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 14.5%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 14.4%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 8.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.11 compared to 3.11, a difference of 0.010%), currently married (48.5% compared to 49.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and family households with children (26.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 44.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 21.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 93.4%, a difference of 3.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 61.2%, a difference of 8.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.6%, a difference of 17.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 37.0%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 15.2%, a difference of 30.6%), and doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 29.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (95.6% compared to 95.6%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Scottish communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 25.5%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 12.4%, a difference of 21.6%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 1.7%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 46.7%, a difference of 3.6%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.5%, a difference of 7.2%).