Latvian vs Immigrants from Guyana Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 112,149,986 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Guyana within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.106. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.035% in Immigrants from Guyana. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 35.2 Immigrants from Guyana.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 51.9%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $92,513, a difference of 30.0%), and per capita income ($52,649 compared to $40,742, a difference of 29.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $55,726, a difference of 5.6%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,773, a difference of 7.8%), and median earnings ($53,001 compared to $45,204, a difference of 17.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 16.9%, a difference of 85.4%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 70.7%), and family poverty (7.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 58.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.5%, a difference of 0.10%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 0.43%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.3%, a difference of 0.68%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 25.5%, a difference of 52.6%), male unemployment (4.8% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 46.8%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 46.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.8%, a difference of 3.1%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.9%, a difference of 3.6%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 10.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 42.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 69.3%, a difference of 9.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 83.0%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 2.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.0%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 83.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 43.1%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 26.1%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 41.9%, a difference of 15.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 0.12%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.3%, a difference of 0.40%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 29.5%, a difference of 201.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 80.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 71.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 70.6%, a difference of 28.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 35.0%, a difference of 60.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 71.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 102.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 93.2%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 70.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.8%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Guyana communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.0%, a difference of 25.5%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 24.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.4% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 0.17%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.4%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.3%, a difference of 4.1%).