Latvian vs Serbian Community Comparison

COMPARE

Latvian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Serbian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Latvians

Serbians

Exceptional
Excellent
9,576
SOCIAL INDEX
93.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
12th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
8,746
SOCIAL INDEX
84.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
53rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Serbian Integration in Latvian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 159,306,428 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Serbians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.351. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.088% in Serbians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 88.1 Serbians.
Latvian Integration in Serbian Communities

Latvian vs Serbian Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $46,551, a difference of 13.1%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $107,157, a difference of 12.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $103,522, a difference of 12.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.64%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,106, a difference of 3.3%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $40,539, a difference of 8.4%).
Latvian vs Serbian Income
Income MetricLatvianSerbian
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$52,649
Exceptional
$46,551
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$120,301
Exceptional
$107,157
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$97,311
Excellent
$87,572
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$53,001
Exceptional
$48,677
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$63,498
Exceptional
$57,975
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,941
Excellent
$40,539
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Excellent
$52,783
Tragic
$51,106
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$108,926
Excellent
$98,320
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$115,957
Excellent
$103,522
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$67,326
Average
$61,087
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.9%
Tragic
27.7%

Latvian vs Serbian Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 13.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 12.6%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 15.1%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.58%), single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.8%).
Latvian vs Serbian Poverty
Poverty MetricLatvianSerbian
Poverty
Exceptional
10.5%
Exceptional
11.2%
Families
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
8.0%
Males
Exceptional
9.6%
Exceptional
10.2%
Females
Exceptional
11.4%
Exceptional
12.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.5%
Exceptional
19.1%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
11.8%
Excellent
13.0%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
14.5%
Excellent
16.3%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.2%
Exceptional
14.8%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.4%
Exceptional
15.1%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
13.5%
Exceptional
15.1%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Excellent
12.5%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.0%
Exceptional
20.1%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.5%
Average
16.4%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
26.9%
Excellent
28.6%
Married Couples
Exceptional
3.9%
Exceptional
4.3%
Seniors Over 65 years
Exceptional
9.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Seniors Over 75 years
Exceptional
10.8%
Exceptional
11.1%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
9.1%
Exceptional
10.3%

Latvian vs Serbian Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.3%, a difference of 7.7%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 1.0%).
Latvian vs Serbian Unemployment
Unemployment MetricLatvianSerbian
Unemployment
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
4.8%
Exceptional
5.1%
Females
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.0%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
16.7%
Exceptional
16.7%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.9%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
6.4%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Good
5.4%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.2%
Exceptional
4.3%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Good
4.8%
Exceptional
4.7%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 75
Excellent
8.6%
Exceptional
8.4%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.8%
Exceptional
7.3%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Excellent
8.8%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
5.1%

Latvian vs Serbian Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 39.9%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.3%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.73%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.3%, a difference of 0.31%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.1%, a difference of 0.36%).
Latvian vs Serbian Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricLatvianSerbian
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Excellent
65.5%
Good
65.2%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Exceptional
80.3%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
38.9%
Exceptional
39.9%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.1%
Exceptional
77.3%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
86.1%
Exceptional
85.5%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
86.0%
Exceptional
85.8%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.4%
Exceptional
85.1%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.8%
Exceptional
83.4%

Latvian vs Serbian Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.7%, a difference of 10.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 9.2%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.37%), family households (62.8% compared to 63.0%, a difference of 0.46%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.12, a difference of 0.50%).
Latvian vs Serbian Family Structure
Family Structure MetricLatvianSerbian
Family Households
Tragic
62.8%
Tragic
63.0%
Family Households with Children
Tragic
26.4%
Tragic
26.4%
Married-couple Households
Exceptional
47.9%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.11
Tragic
3.12
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.2%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.7%
Currently Married
Exceptional
48.5%
Exceptional
47.8%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.6%
Average
12.0%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.7%
Good
30.7%

Latvian vs Serbian Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 3.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 56.1%, a difference of 0.22%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.7%, a difference of 0.37%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Latvian vs Serbian Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricLatvianSerbian
No Vehicles Available
Excellent
9.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
90.3%
Exceptional
90.7%
2+ Vehicles Available
Excellent
56.2%
Excellent
56.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Fair
19.3%
Fair
19.1%
4+ Vehicles Available
Fair
6.1%
Poor
6.0%

Latvian vs Serbian Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 30.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 29.8%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 16.1%, a difference of 23.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.4%, a difference of 0.13%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.13%).
Latvian vs Serbian Education Level
Education Level MetricLatvianSerbian
No Schooling Completed
Exceptional
1.5%
Exceptional
1.7%
Nursery School
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
Kindergarten
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.4%
1st Grade
Exceptional
98.5%
Exceptional
98.3%
2nd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.3%
3rd Grade
Exceptional
98.4%
Exceptional
98.2%
4th Grade
Exceptional
98.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
5th Grade
Exceptional
98.1%
Exceptional
97.9%
6th Grade
Exceptional
97.9%
Exceptional
97.7%
7th Grade
Exceptional
97.2%
Exceptional
97.0%
8th Grade
Exceptional
97.0%
Exceptional
96.7%
9th Grade
Exceptional
96.4%
Exceptional
96.0%
10th Grade
Exceptional
95.6%
Exceptional
95.1%
11th Grade
Exceptional
94.7%
Exceptional
94.1%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Exceptional
93.6%
Exceptional
92.8%
High School Diploma
Exceptional
92.0%
Exceptional
91.1%
GED/Equivalency
Exceptional
89.2%
Exceptional
87.9%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
71.6%
Exceptional
67.4%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
66.1%
Exceptional
61.4%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
53.9%
Exceptional
48.5%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
46.1%
Exceptional
40.1%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
19.8%
Exceptional
16.1%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
6.2%
Exceptional
4.8%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Excellent
2.0%

Latvian vs Serbian Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Serbian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.5%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 7.7%), and ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.7%, a difference of 0.35%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 0.55%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.3%, a difference of 0.69%).
Latvian vs Serbian Disability
Disability MetricLatvianSerbian
Disability
Excellent
11.4%
Poor
11.9%
Males
Good
11.1%
Poor
11.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.7%
Fair
12.3%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.3%
Tragic
1.3%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Average
5.6%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Poor
6.8%
Tragic
6.9%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Good
11.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.2%
Exceptional
22.3%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
45.1%
Exceptional
46.1%
Vision
Exceptional
2.0%
Good
2.1%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.3%
Cognitive
Exceptional
16.6%
Exceptional
16.7%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.7%
Average
6.1%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%