Latvian vs Immigrants from Nicaragua Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 132,112,677 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Nicaragua within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.199% in Immigrants from Nicaragua. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 199.5 Immigrants from Nicaragua.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $38,065, a difference of 38.3%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $88,267, a difference of 36.3%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $47,482, a difference of 33.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $53,266, a difference of 0.91%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 21.2%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $36,023, a difference of 22.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 89.1%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 7.1%, a difference of 82.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 68.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.3%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 16.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 16.9%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 16.0%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.6%, a difference of 23.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 72.9%, a difference of 4.3%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.1%, a difference of 0.70%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 1.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 40.6%), births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 38.0%, a difference of 37.0%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 32.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 6.5%), family households (62.8% compared to 67.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 44.5%, a difference of 7.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.8%, a difference of 10.9%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.1%, a difference of 0.25%), no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 55.4%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 3.1%, a difference of 99.4%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.4%, a difference of 89.6%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 96.9%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Nicaragua communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 20.5%), hearing disability (3.2% compared to 2.7%, a difference of 19.7%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 0.98%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 1.1%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 1.1%).