Latvian vs Immigrants from Lebanon Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,676,945 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Lebanon within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.366. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.049% in Immigrants from Lebanon. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 48.6 Immigrants from Lebanon.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $46,938, a difference of 12.2%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $110,159, a difference of 9.2%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $58,835, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.5%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,729, a difference of 4.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $64,521, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 68.3%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 33.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.2% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.46%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 1.8%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 19.6%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 19.2%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (4.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 19.1%), and female unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.74%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.84%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 35.2%, a difference of 10.4%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 73.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 82.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.5%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 82.3%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 9.5%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 8.0%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.30, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father households (2.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 0.55%), and married-couple households (47.9% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.4%, a difference of 16.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.6%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 19.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 49.5%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 14.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.65%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.8%, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Immigrants from Lebanon communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 13.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.0%, a difference of 13.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.72%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 0.78%), and disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 0.79%).