Latvian vs Hopi Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,003,632 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Hopi within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.080. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.013% in Hopi. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 13.2 Hopi.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $31,177, a difference of 68.9%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $77,188, a difference of 55.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($115,957 compared to $75,562, a difference of 53.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $46,978, a difference of 12.4%), median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $33,932, a difference of 29.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $50,925, a difference of 32.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 21.6%, a difference of 136.3%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 125.0%), and male poverty (9.6% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 117.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (26.9% compared to 34.5%, a difference of 28.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 28.2%, a difference of 44.8%), and single female poverty (19.0% compared to 28.0%, a difference of 47.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 16.8%, a difference of 147.8%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 11.9%, a difference of 139.0%), and male unemployment (4.8% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 122.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.8%, a difference of 22.2%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 66.0%, a difference of 15.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 79.3%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 77.0%, a difference of 10.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 75.0%, a difference of 11.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 50.8%, a difference of 83.3%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 8.5%, a difference of 60.4%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.8%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (62.8% compared to 65.3%, a difference of 4.0%), family households with children (26.4% compared to 25.2%, a difference of 4.8%), and divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 13.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 40.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 49.0%, a difference of 14.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 86.4%, a difference of 4.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 12.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 82.3%), bachelor's degree (46.1% compared to 25.3%, a difference of 82.2%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.6%, a difference of 71.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.3%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Hopi communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 252.8%), vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 46.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 30.0%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.9%, a difference of 7.6%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.9%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 9.8%).