Latvian vs Fijian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 42,907,739 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Fijians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.914. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.246% in Fijians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 246.1 Fijians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $36,690, a difference of 43.5%), median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $45,607, a difference of 39.2%), and median family income ($120,301 compared to $87,387, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $50,132, a difference of 5.3%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $56,768, a difference of 18.6%), and wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 22.9%, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 48.1%), family poverty (7.1% compared to 10.1%, a difference of 43.1%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 13.0%, a difference of 42.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.7%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.7%, a difference of 5.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (10.8% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 8.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 36.8%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 6.6%, a difference of 29.8%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 23.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.10%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.2% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 0.50%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.63%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 40.4%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 82.9%, a difference of 3.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.8%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 78.4%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 3.0%, a difference of 49.7%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 36.1%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 32.3%, a difference of 16.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple households (47.9% compared to 46.1%, a difference of 4.0%), currently married (48.5% compared to 46.3%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 90.5%, a difference of 0.22%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.6%, a difference of 2.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 128.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 2.9%, a difference of 113.4%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 10.3%, a difference of 92.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.98%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 97.5%, a difference of 0.98%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Fijian communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.2%, a difference of 30.0%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 27.2%), and vision disability (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 4.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 7.2%, a difference of 5.1%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 6.3%).