Latvian vs Croatian Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 194,339,028 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Croatians within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.240. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.171% in Croatians. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 170.9 Croatians.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,649 compared to $47,742, a difference of 10.3%), median family income ($120,301 compared to $111,370, a difference of 8.0%), and median household income ($97,311 compared to $90,685, a difference of 7.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $51,662, a difference of 2.2%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 29.0%, a difference of 4.0%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $59,715, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 15.4%, a difference of 6.0%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (11.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 5.8%), and receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 5.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 0.51%), married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 3.9%, a difference of 0.98%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 9.6%, a difference of 11.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 7.5%, a difference of 11.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 5.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.020%), female unemployment (4.7% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 0.14%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 41.1%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 77.2%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 64.7%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (85.4% compared to 85.2%, a difference of 0.23%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.6%, a difference of 0.23%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 85.8%, a difference of 0.39%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 30.2%, a difference of 8.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.9%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.4% compared to 26.4%, a difference of 0.10%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.10, a difference of 0.21%), and currently married (48.5% compared to 48.9%, a difference of 0.89%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.3%, a difference of 18.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.6%, a difference of 6.7%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.9%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 58.6%, a difference of 4.2%), and 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.5%, a difference of 6.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.3%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 27.0%), and master's degree (19.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 20.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.5%, a difference of 0.020%), high school diploma (92.0% compared to 92.0%, a difference of 0.030%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.6%, a difference of 0.080%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Croatian communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.5%, a difference of 17.3%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 11.8%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.7%, a difference of 1.3%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.8%, a difference of 2.7%).