Latvian vs Filipino Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 155,750,974 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Filipinos within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.009% in Filipinos. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 8.5 Filipinos.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($97,311 compared to $115,509, a difference of 18.7%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $128,723, a difference of 18.2%), and median male earnings ($63,498 compared to $74,224, a difference of 16.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 29.7%, a difference of 6.6%), householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $57,740, a difference of 9.4%), and per capita income ($52,649 compared to $59,066, a difference of 12.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 11.6%, a difference of 25.0%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 7.4%, a difference of 23.3%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (13.4% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 20.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 19.0%, a difference of 2.5%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.5% compared to 9.7%, a difference of 3.1%), and married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 3.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 13.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.1%, a difference of 10.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 7.9%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.23%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.34%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 31.7%, a difference of 22.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (76.1% compared to 71.4%, a difference of 6.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.9%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.35%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.1%, a difference of 0.59%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.5%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 23.0%, a difference of 20.7%), divorced or separated (11.6% compared to 9.9%, a difference of 17.1%), and single mother households (5.3% compared to 4.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.5% compared to 49.7%, a difference of 2.6%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.20, a difference of 3.1%), and family households (62.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 6.9%, a difference of 13.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 20.8%, a difference of 7.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 89.7%, a difference of 0.72%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.8%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 33.3%), no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 27.5%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 7.6%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 12th grade, no diploma (93.6% compared to 93.2%, a difference of 0.37%), ged/equivalency (89.2% compared to 89.5%, a difference of 0.40%), and nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.45%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Filipino communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 25.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 45.4%, a difference of 0.66%), cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.5%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.2%, a difference of 6.6%).